 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CASE HIGHLIGHTS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WONG WOEN MUN v. LYC MOTHER & CHILD CENTRE SDN BHD Abstract – A trained employee, who is employed for her experience, expertise and qualifications to perform a certain task falling under her job scope, cannot say that there was no proper standard operating procedures and training in place as she ought to have known her duties and responsibilities to perform such duty. LABOUR LAW: Employment – Dismissal – Misconduct – Employer involved in business of providing care and nursing needs for mother and babies – Employee employed as Staff Nurse – Employee dismissed from employment due to work-related negligence – Mishandling of babies – Whether employee failed in discharge of duties and responsibilities as Staff Nurse – Whether acts of misconduct proven – Whether there was lack of standard operating procedures and training in handling babies – Whether there was condonation of misconduct – Whether there were acts of victimisation and favouritism by employee – Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) TORT: Negligence – Work-related negligence – Misconduct – Employer involved in business of providing care and nursing needs for mother and babies – Employee employed as Staff Nurse – Employee dismissed from employment due to work-related negligence – Mishandling of babies – Whether employee failed in discharge of duties and responsibilities as Staff Nurse - Whether acts of misconduct proven ROLAND EPPINGA lwn. CIMB INVESTMENT BANK BERHAD Abstrak – Penting dan menjadi satu keutamaan agar seorang pekerja diberikan penjelasan awal, melalui surat tunjuk sebab atau apa-apa bentuk siasatan lain, agar dia diberi pendedahan khusus dan menyeluruh tentang kekurangan dan kelemahan yang ada pada dirinya dan berpeluang untuk memberi penjelasan dan mempertahankan dirinya. UNDANG-UNDANG BURUH: Pekerjaan – Penamatan kontrak perkhidmatan – Pihak menuntut dilantik untuk kontrak perkhidmatan tempoh tetap – Kontrak perkhidmatan dibaharui dan disambung setiap dua tahun dari 2015 hingga 2021 – Syarikat menamatkan kontrak perkhidmatan pihak menuntut sebelum tamat tempoh atas alasan kemerosotan prestasi – Sama ada kemerosotan prestasi berjaya dibuktikan – Sama ada tindakan-tindakan syarikat menyokong pengataan bahawa prestasi pihak menuntut merosot – Sama ada penamatan perkhidmatan adil – Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, s. 20(3) KONTRAK: Kontrak perkhidmatan – Penamatan – Pihak menuntut dilantik untuk kontrak perkhidmatan tempoh tetap – Kontrak perkhidmatan dibaharui dan disambung setiap dua tahun dari 2015 hingga 2021 – Syarikat menamatkan kontrak perkhidmatan pihak menuntut sebelum tamat tempoh atas alasan kemerosotan prestasi – Sama ada kemerosotan prestasi berjaya dibuktikan – Sama ada tindakan-tindakan syarikat menyokong pengataan bahawa prestasi pihak menuntut merosot |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 4 of 2024) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
APPEAL/REVIEW UPDATES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
