LLB Bulletin Header
LLB Bulletin #2/2024 7 February 2024

LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 1 of 2024)

SUBJECT INDEX

BANKING

Banks and banking business – Nature of banking business – Employee served with bank as Service Associate/Teller – Employee dismissed from employment due to misconduct of misappropriation of bank's cash money – Cash shortage discovered after cash balance surprise check at end of day by superior – Qualities expected of bank's employees in discharge of duties – Whether dismissal warranted – Whether charge against employee grave misconduct involving core of bank's business
Sasikumar Paramasivam v. United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Bhd
(Zulhelmy Hasan) [2024] 1 ILR 155 cljlaw labourlaw

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Costs – Award – Claimant performed poorly, exhibited bad attitude and provided false employment history – Claimant failed to improve despite being given opportunity – Claimant not confirmed in employment and later terminated – Discovery that claimant serial vexatious litigant with habit of bringing unfair dismissal claims against former employers – Whether claimant engineered move to get sacked from employment – Whether costs ought to be ordered against claimant – General practice of Industrial Court in awarding costs – Industrial Relations Regulations 1967, reg. 5
Ching Suet Yeen v. Lepcon Tools (M) Sdn Bhd
(Paramalingam J Doraisamy) [2024] 1 ILR 136 cljlaw labourlaw

INDUSTRIAL COURT

Award – Non-compliance – Complaint – Termination of employment – Complainant claimed against company – Industrial Court found claimant was dismissed without just cause or excuse and awarded backwages – Payment of compensation not forthcoming – Allegation of no knowledge of suit by directors and shareholders – Liability of directors and shareholders – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 56(1) – Industrial Court Rules 1967, r. 24A
Audra Lim Suet Moong v. Evergreen Wg Sdn Bhd
(Andersen Ong Wai Leong) [2024] 1 ILR 16 cljlaw labourlaw

Jurisdiction – Rehearing matter de novo – Employee terminated from employment due to two allegations of misconduct – Non-convening of domestic inquiry – Whether employee afforded chance to answer charges – Whether employer acted contrary to rules of natural justice – Whether proper procedure of dismissal complied with – Whether non-convening of domestic inquiry fatal to employer's case – Jurisdiction of Industrial Court to rehear matter de novo – Whether breach of natural justice cured
Halim Tumin v. Win Win Food Industries Sdn Bhd
(Amrik Singh) [2024] 1 ILR 51 cljlaw labourlaw

LABOUR LAW

Collective agreement – Trade dispute – Salary – Discrimination – Adjustment of salary – Four employees not paid salary adjustment while four others with same designation were paid – Whether there was discrimination
Kesatuan Pekerja-pekerja Perkilangan Perusahaan Makanan v. Nestle Manufacturing (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
(Augustine Anthony) [2024] 1 ILR 1 cljlaw labourlaw

Dismissal – Misconduct – Collecting monies from foreign workers to join as members of Employees' Union – Whether act done in company's place of business – Whether done during office hours – Whether there was approval of employer – Whether ingredient of s. 7 of Industrial Relations Act 1967 satisfied
Halim Tumin v. Win Win Food Industries Sdn Bhd
(Amrik Singh) [2024] 1 ILR 51 cljlaw labourlaw

Dismissal – Misconduct – Employee served with bank as Service Associate/ Teller – Employee misappropriated bank's cash money – Cash shortage discovered after cash balance surprise check at end of day by superior – Employee dismissed from employment with immediate effect – Whether charge of misconduct against employee proven on balance of probabilities – Whether punishment of dismissal proportionate – Whether dismissal done with just cause or excuse
Sasikumar Paramasivam v. United Overseas Bank (Malaysia) Bhd
(Zulhelmy Hasan) [2024] 1 ILR 155 cljlaw labourlaw

Dismissal – Misconduct – Entering into restricted area of company's foreign worker's hostel unlawfully and failing to wear mandatory face mask – Whether misconduct warranting dismissal Halim Tumin v. Win Win Food Industries Sdn Bhd
(Amrik Singh) [2024] 1 ILR 51 cljlaw labourlaw

Dismissal – Retrenchment – Redundancy – Whether dismissal done with just cause or excuse – Whether retrenched – Whether circumstances existed which justified termination exercise undertaken – Whether retrenchment exercise bona fide and fair labour practice – Whether reinstatement proper remedy
Mageswaran Rajasekaran v. BT Global Technology (M) Sdn Bhd
(Vanithamany Sivalingam) [2024] 1 ILR 30 cljlaw labourlaw

Employment – Dismissal – Employee dismissed from employment due to allegations of poor performance – Whether proven – Whether employee warned about poor performance – Whether employee accorded sufficient opportunity to improve – Whether termination simpliciter – Whether termination lawful – Whether dismissal done with just cause or excuse
Kevin Ho Kin Kee v. Hengyuan International Sdn Bhd
(Salahudin Hidayat Shariff) [2024] 1 ILR 84 cljlaw labourlaw

Employment – Dismissal – Probationer – Probationer performed poorly, exhibited bad attitude and provided false employment history – Probationer failed to improve despite being given opportunity – Probationer not confirmed in employment and later terminated – Whether dismissal capricious or arbitrary
Ching Suet Yeen v. Lepcon Tools (M) Sdn Bhd
(Paramalingam J Doraisamy) [2024] 1 ILR 136 cljlaw labourlaw

Employment – Terms and conditions – Employee's retirement benefits – Trade dispute – Complaint by Trade Union of employee's retirement benefits – Applicable retirement benefit formula – Whether 12% of total base salary, pursuant to Employee's Handbook – Whether one month last drawn salary for each completed year of service, as reported company's financial statement – Whether financial statement could serve as source of establishing terms and conditions of employment
Kesatuan Sekerja Industri Elektronik Wilayah Barat Semenanjung Malaysia v. Chemi-con (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
(Syed Noh Said Nazir) [2024] 1 ILR 212 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct – Insubordination – Disobedience – Employee assigned to perform certain tasks at project office – Employee stopped coming to project office and/or stopped contributing to project – Employee neglected and/or failed to obey official instructions from superior requesting her to report for duty and/or resume work – Employee found guilty of charges of misconduct and dismissed – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse
Adibah Hani Azit v. Petroliam Nasional Berhad (Petronas)
(Syed Noh Said Nazir) [2024] 1 ILR 98 cljlaw labourlaw

TRADE DISPUTE

Collective agreement – Interpretation and execution of collective agreement – Upgrading exercise by company – Requirements to be fulfilled by non-executive employees before eligible for upgrade – Whether there was non-compliance of collective agreement by company – Whether job enrichment criteria
Kesatuan Pekerja Telekom Malaysia Berhad Sarawak v. Telekom Malaysia Berhad
(Nazri Ismail) [2024] 1 ILR 44 cljlaw labourlaw

Collective agreement – Salary – Adjustment of salary – Four employees not paid salary adjustment while four others with same designation were paid – Whether there was distinction in work portfolio with different tasks and responsibilities – Whether there were additional duties – Whether there was discrimination in terms of salary adjustment – Whether discrimination fair – Whether there was resultant harm or injury to those who were discriminated – Whether there was inordinate delay in raising grievances
Kesatuan Pekerja-pekerja Perkilangan Perusahaan Makanan v. Nestle Manufacturing (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
(Augustine Anthony) [2024] 1 ILR 1 cljlaw labourlaw

Complaint – Retirement benefits of employee – Applicable retirement benefit formula – Whether 12% of total base salary, pursuant to Employee's Handbook – Whether one month last drawn salary for each completed year of service, as reported in company's financial statement
Kesatuan Sekerja Industri Elektronik Wilayah Barat Semenanjung Malaysia v. Chemi-con (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
(Syed Noh Said Nazir) [2024] 1 ILR 212 cljlaw labourlaw

WORDS & PHRASES

‘during working hours' – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 7 – Misconduct – Collecting monies from foreign workers at hostel to join as members of Employees' Union – Whether ‘place of business' includes hostel or place of accommodation of workers – Whether exclusion/omission of words ‘during working hours' in termination letter detrimental
Halim Tumin v. Win Win Food Industries Sdn Bhd
(Amrik Singh) [2024] 1 ILR 51 cljlaw labourlaw

INDEKS PERKARA

KONTRAK

Kontrak perkhidmatan – Gaji – Pihak menuntut mendakwa dirinya pekerja syarikat dan telah ditamatkan perkhidmatan secara terancang – Sama ada pihak menuntut pekerja syarikat – Sama ada majikan gagal membayar gaji - Sama ada terdapat pelanggaran kontrak – Sama ada terdapat pemecatan – Sama ada pemecatan dengan sebab dan alasan yang adil
Chu Boon Kit lwn. Kollect System Sdn Bhd
(Mohd Zulbahrin Zainuddin) [2024] 1 ILR 224 cljlaw labourlaw

UNDANG-UNDANG BURUH

Pekerjaan – Penamatan – Pihak menuntut ditamatkan perkhidmatan – Pihak menuntut diperdaya oleh majikan dan ditamatkan perkhidmatan – Sama ada penamatan perkhidmatan pihak menuntut dibuat secara adil – Sama ada tindakan majikan menamatkan perkhidmatan tidak wajar serta tanpa sebab atau alasan yang munasabah – Majikan gagal hadir perbicaraan – Sama ada pengembalian jawatan remedi yang sesuai
Mohd Khairul Syazwi Maliha lwn. YR Capital Sdn Bhd
(Zalina Awang) [2024] 1 ILR 73 cljlaw labourlaw

Pekerjaan – Penamatan – Penamatan terancang – Gaji – Sama ada majikan gagal membayar gaji – Sama ada terdapat pemecatan – Sama ada pemecatan dengan sebab dan alasan yang adil – Sama ada peletakan jawatan pihak menuntut ditolak
Chu Boon Kit lwn. Kollect System Sdn Bhd
(Mohd Zulbahrin Zainuddin) [2024] 1 ILR 224 cljlaw labourlaw

Pekerjaan – Penamatan – Salah laku – Gangguan seksual di tempat kerja – Pihak menuntut ditamatkan perkhidmatan selepas didapati bersalah atas dua pertuduhan gangguan seksual di tempat kerja – Pihak menuntut meraba belakang pengadu/mangsa, membuat kontak mata, mengeluarkan komenkomen berbaur seksual dan membuat panggilan video lewat malam dan mengirim WhatsApp pada pengadu – Sama ada keterangan sokongan diperlukan dalam kes-kes melibatkan gangguan seksual – Sama ada penamatan kerja pihak menuntut adalah atas sebab dan alasan yang munasabah – Sama ada penamatan kerja pihak menuntut selaras dengan prinsip asas keadilan asasi – Akta Kerja 1955 (Pindaan 2012)
Magendran Gunasekharan lwn. Mattel (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
(Rusita Md Lazim) [2024] 1 ILR 188 cljlaw labourlaw

Copyright © 2024 MYLAWBOX Sdn Bhd To unsubscribe click here