|
||
LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 5 of 2023) |
||
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Judicial review – Appeal – Making fraudulent dental claim and instructing
personnel at dental clinic to prepare receipt under own name despite not
receiving treatment – Treatment received by spouse – Whether there was
misconduct – Employee dismissed from employment – Industrial Court
found dismissal was without just cause and excuse – Decision affirmed by
High Court – Whether Industrial Court and High Court erred – Whether
decision made based on evidence adduced CIVIL PROCEDURE Striking out – Writ of summons and statement of claim – High Court claim
– Appeal against – Employee claimed against employer for negligence and
torts of emotional distress, harassment and bullying – Application by
employer to strike out writ of summons and statement of claim – Whether
essentially claim for constructive dismissal – Whether High Court lacked
requisite jurisdiction to hear and determine claim – Whether ought to have
been pursued via s. 20 of Industrial Relations Act 1967 – Whether claim
abuse of process – Rules of Court 2012, O. 18 r. 19(1)(a), (b), (d) CONTRACT Breach – Employment contract – Absenteeism – Absence from work for five
days without authorisation, approval and without informing employer –
Employee caused disruption in work due to continuous absence – Employee
dismissed from employment – Whether there was breach of employment
contract by employee – Whether employer justified in treating contract of
employment as having been repudiated – Whether employee terminated
employment with employer unilaterally – Employment Act 1955, s. 15(2) Employment contract – Breach – Employee assigned and re-assigned to
acting positions before being informed by employer to return to original
designation – Whether employer’s conduct in breach of fundamental term of
employee’s contract of employment – Whether re-assignment required valid
justification – Whether within employer’s prerogative to transfer, assign and
re-assign employee Employment contract – Master-servant relationship between employeremployee
– Duty to perform duly and faithfully – Foreman misdiagnosed
cars on numerous occasions – Whether there was breach of duty by
employee – Employee dismissed from employment – Whether dismissal
with just cause or excuse Employment contract – Non-issuance – Employee employed by employer
without written contract of employment – Employee dismissed from
employment – Employee demanded for payment of salary but told by
employer to produce employment contract – Whether non-issuance of
employment contract neglect in duties and responsibilities – Lack of proper
documentation of employment terms, conditions and tenure Employment contract – Termination – Non-issuance of termination letter –
Employee verbally dismissed by employer – Employer refused to give
written termination or dismissal letter – Lack of proper documentation –
Whether conduct of employer justified – Whether unfair labour practice,
victimisation and mistreatment of employee LABOUR LAW Dismissal – Constructive dismissal – Employee assigned and re-assigned to
acting positions before being informed by employer to return to original
designation – Whether acting position permanent – Whether there was
demotion – Whether there was constructive dismissal Dismissal – Constructive dismissal – Forced resignation – Employee refused
to accede to employer’s instruction – Allegation that instruction by employer
not within employee’s authority and job scope, unethical and unprofessional
– Employer demanded for employee’s resignation – Employee resigned
under protest – Whether claimant coerced into resigning – Whether
resignation voluntary – Whether there was constructive dismissal – Whether
reinstatement to former position appropriate remedy Dismissal – Misconduct – Claim – Making fraudulent dental claim and
instructing personnel at dental clinic to prepare receipt under own name
despite not receiving treatment – Treatment received by spouse – Whether
there was misconduct – Employee dismissed from employment – Whether
dismissal made with just cause or excuse Dismissal – Poor performance – Allegations of – Employer alleged that
employee performed poorly – Employee placed under performance
improvement plan and later dismissed – Whether employee poor performer
– Whether evidence pointed towards contrary – Whether employer’s moves
orchestrated to rid employee of company – Whether employer’s acts mala fide – Whether there was victimisation and unfair treatment – Whether
dismissal with just cause or excuse Dismissal – Unfair labour practice, victimisation and mistreatment of
employee – Employee verbally dismissed by employer – Employer refused
to give written termination or dismissal letter – Whether unfair labour
practice, victimisation and mistreatment of employee – Whether dismissal
with just cause or excuse Misconduct – Absenteeism – Excessive medical/sick, emergency and
unpaid leaves – Employee dismissed from employment – Duty to attend
work – Whether discharged – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse Misconduct – Tardiness – Frequent lateness to work – Employee placed
under plan for improvement but did not improve – Defiance of employer’s
instructions to be punctual – Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse TORT Damages – Claim for – Employee claimed against employer for negligence
and torts of emotional distress, harassment and bullying – Whether
allegations of torts simply ‘building blocks’ for complaint of constructive
dismissal – Whether established – Whether abuse of process of court for
employee to file common law action at civil court – Whether employee ought to have gone to Industrial Court – Whether employee ought to have
pursued statutory dispute resolution mechanism/process to obtain remedies
under Industrial Relations Act 1967 WORDS AND PHRASES ‘acting’ – Employment – Employee assigned and re-assigned to acting
positions before being informed by employer to return to original designation
– Whether ‘acting role’ means temporary position and assignment INDEKS PERKARA KONTRAK Kontrak perkhidmatan – Kontrak tempoh tetap – Pekerja ditawarkan
kontrak tempoh tetap – Kontrak dibaharui dan disambung beberapa kali
untuk jangka masa panjang – Sama ada tindakan syarikat membaharui
kontrak perkhidmatan pihak menuntut setiap tahun menunjukkan pihak
menuntut adalah pekerja tetap syarikat – Kontrak tidak dibaharui – Sama ada
berlaku penamatan atau kontrak perkhidmatan semata-mata telah tamat –
Sama ada kontrak tempoh tetap perkhidmatan boleh berubah menjadi
kontrak pekerjaan TORT Kecuaian – Kecuaian pekerja – Kemalangan jalan raya – Pekerja berkhidmat
sebagai pemandu lori tanker – Pekerja terlibat dalam kemalangan jalan raya
dan menyebabkan kerugian dan kerosakan – Pekerja ditamatkan
perkhidmatan – Sama ada kemalangan diakibatkan oleh kecuaian pekerja –
Sama ada pekerja bertindak konsisten dengan hubungan fidusiari majikan –
pekerja – Sama ada kecuaian pekerja mewajarkan penamatan perkhidmatan UNDANG-UNDANG BURUH Pekerjaan – Pemecatan – Pekerja dalam tempoh percubaan – Pihak
menuntut/pekerja dalam tempoh percubaan ditamatkan perkhidmatan –
Prestasi yang tidak memuaskan dan kegagalan mencapai sasaran syarikat –
Sama ada majikan ada memberi apa-apa amaran pada pekerja – Sama ada pemecatan dibuat atas sebab dan alasan adil – Sama ada pengambilan
kedudukan jawatan asal sesuai diperintahkan – Sama ada pampasan sebagai
ganti rugi pengembalian ke jawatan asal boleh diawardkan Pekerjaan – Penamatan – Pekerja berkhidmat sebagai pemandu lori tanker –
Pekerja terlibat dalam kemalangan jalan raya dan menyebabkan kerugian dan
kerosakan – Pekerja ditamatkan perkhidmatan – Sama ada kemalangan
diakibatkan oleh kecuaian pekerja – Sama ada penamatan perkhidmatan atas
sebab yang adil dan munasabah |
||
|