RAVENDRAN SUPPIAH v. MALAYSIAN ASSURANCE ALLIANCE BERHAD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
AHMAD ROSLI MOHD SHAM
AWARD NO. 411 OF 2015 [CASE NO: 11(4)(11)/4-42/10]
13 APRIL 2015
DISMISSAL: Constructive dismissal - Benefits - Bonus payments - Claimant not paid his bonus - Whether it had been contractual - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Company's actions in the past - Whether it had become an implied term of his contract of employment - Whether the non-payment of the bonus had been a fundamental breach which had gone to the root of his contract of employment - Factors to consider - Effect of - Whether the claimant had been constructively dismissed - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
DISMISSAL: Constructive dismissal - Benefits - Bonus payments - Whether it had been part of the claimant's remuneration - Perusal of the Handbook and its contents - Effect of - Whether he had been entitled to it as of right - Effect of - Company not giving any reason why bonus not paid to him - Whether it had amounted to a fundamental breach going to the root of the contract of employment - What it should have done - Whether the claimant had been constructively dismissed - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
NIK ROSKIMAN ABDUL SAMAD v. UNIVERSITI ISLAM ANTARABANGSA MALAYSIA
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
GULAM MUHIADDEEN ABDUL AZIZ
AWARD NO. 530 OF 2015 [CASE NO: 12/4-413/11]
30 APRIL 2015
DISMISSAL: Notice of termination - Summary dismissal - Claimant's post as Lecturer subject to him obtaining a PhD in the relevant field - Claimant failing to obtain his PhD - Whether that had entitled the university to terminate his services - Factors to consider - Effect of - Whether it had amounted to a unilateral termination by the university - Evidence adduced - Evaluation of - Whether the university's actions had been reasonable - Effect of - Whether there had been a dismissal
DISMISSAL: Notice of termination - Summary dismissal - Claimant terminated for failing to obtain his PhD - Whether the university had followed its own procedures - What it should have done - Whether it had taken into account the claimant's years of service and contributions with it for the past nine years - Effect of - Whether dismissal had been too harsh under the circumstances
|