LIM CHAI HOCK v. CHEVRON MALAYSIA LIMITED
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
SAROJINI KANDASAMY
AWARD NO. 251 OF 2016 [CASE NO: 4/4-935/13]
10 MARCH 2016
DISMISSAL: Retrenchment - Redundancy - Claimant accepting the severance package on a without prejudice basis - What that had meant - Whether that had precluded him from bringing an unfair dismissal claim - Factors to consider - Effect of
DISMISSAL: Retrenchment - Redundancy - Selection for redundancy - Company offering him alternative employment - What that had meant - Whether the company had to prove that his position had been genuinely and truly redundant first - Factors to consider - Effect of
DISMISSAL: Retrenchment - Redundancy - Selection for redundancy - Whether the claimant's position had become redundant - Whether his job functions had ceased to exist - Factors to consider - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Claimant accepting the severance package on a without prejudice basis - What that had meant - Whether the claimant's retrenchment had been carried out bona fide - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
DISMISSAL: Retrenchment - Reorganisation - Whether there had been a necessity to restructure and reorganise the Lubricant Business Division - Evidence adduced - Factors to consider - Effect of - Whether a redundancy situation had existed in the company - Whether the claimant's retrenchment had been carried out bona fide - Whether dismissal without just cause and excuse
EVIDENCE: Burden of proof - Whose burden to prove that a redundancy situation had existed
LEE HOE CHOON v. FUJIKURA ASIA (M) SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
GULAM MUHIADDEEN ABDUL AZIZ
AWARD NO. 374 OF 2016 [CASE NO: 12/4-1041/13]
28 MARCH 2016
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT: Terms and conditions - Retirement age - Claimant's employment letter not containing a clause on the age of retirement - Retirement age stated in the company's Staff Manual - Whether the Staff Manual had bound the claimant - Factors to consider - Effect of
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT: Terms and conditions - Retirement age - Whether the claimant had a reasonable expectation to work beyond his retirement age - Evidence adduced - Effect of
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT: Terms and conditions - Retirement age - Whether the claimant had been aware of the retirement age in the Staff Manual - Factors to consider - Claimant using the Staff Manual to pay retrenchment benefits to the employees of the company - Claimant also enjoying benefits provided under it - Effect of
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT: Terms and conditions - Retirement age - Whether the company had been reasonable and fair in introducing the retirement age in its Staff Manual - Reasons why it had been introduced - Effect of - Minimum Retirement Age Act 2012
EVIDENCE: Burden of proof - Whether discharged by the claimant in proving that he had had a legitimate expectation to work beyond the retirement age
|