|
KHOO PENG WAI v. PEMBINAAN TERASIA SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
ANNA NG FUI CHOO
AWARD NO. 59 OF 2016 [CASE NO: 3(13)(3)/4-477/14]
15 JANUARY 2016
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT: Type of - Whether it had been a contract for service or a contract of service - Factors to consider - Evidence adduced - Evaluation of DISMISSAL: Performance - Unsatisfactory performance - Whether the claimant had failed to perform up to expectations - Factors to consider - Evidence adduced by the company - Whether it had been sufficient - Whether this charge had been proven by the company - No reviews or appraisals conducted on the claimant - Whether he had been given an opportunity to improve - Whether the company had been justified in dismissing him - Whether dismissal without just cause and excuse DISMISSAL: Probationer - Whether the claimant had been a probationer - Perusal of the contract of employment - What the intention of the parties had been - Whether "appraisal" had been synonymous with "probation period" - Factors to consider EVIDENCE: Documentary evidence - Whether the claimant had been a workman under the Act - Factors to consider - Effect of INDUSTRIAL COURT: Remedies - Reinstatement - Whether suitable to award - Claimant under a fixed term contract - What would be suitable to award - Determination of LING HOONG HOONG lwn. ACI HOLDINGS (M) SDN BHD
MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN, KUALA LUMPUR
HAMDAN INDAH
AWARD NO. 79 TAHUN 2016 [NO. KES: 7/4-192/10]
26 JANUARI 2016
KETERANGAN: Keterangan dokumentari - Keputusan SD - Sama ada sah dan boleh dipertahankan - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN: Remedi - Pengembalian semula ke jawatan asal - Sama ada dipohon oleh YM - Penelitian pliding - Kesannya - Sama ada tuntutan YM harus ditolak - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira PEMBUANGAN KERJA: Prestasi kerja - Prestasi kerja yang tidak memuaskan - Sama ada dibuktikan oleh syarikat - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - Kelakuan syarikat terhadap YM - Sama ada elemen mala fide wujud - Penelitian fakta kes - Kesannya - Sama ada syarikat telah mengikut prosedur dan amalan yang betul dalam menamatkan perkhidmatan YM - Sama ada penamatan kerja YM telah dilakukan secara adil dan bersebab SIASATAN DALAMAN: Kesilapan prosedur - Komposisi ahli panel SD - Sama ada prinsip keadilan asasi telah diikuti oleh syarikat dalam menjalankan SD tersebut - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira SIASATAN DALAMAN: Kesilapan prosedur - Pertuduhan - Sama ada kandungan pertuduhan-pertuduhan terhadap YM adalah cacat - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Sama ada pertuduhan-pertuduhan tersebut cukup spesifik untuk membolehkan YM menyediakan pembelaannya - Kesannya |
