If you can't view the message, please click here. | |||
<< Back | BULLETIN 12/2012 | ||
LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 11 of 2012) | |||
SUBJECT INDEX COMPANY LAW Procedure - Dismissal claim against wound-up company - Whether leave of High Court required before claim could be proceeded with - Companies Act 1965, s. 226(3)Soosay Anthony v. CHG Plywood Sdn Bhd (Ong Geok Lan) [2012] 4 ILR 266 CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT Terms and conditions - Grooming Rules - Whether claimant had been in breach of Grooming Rules - Claimant member of Union - Whether she had been subject to terms of Collective Agreement (CA) - Whether CA had superseded her contract of employment - Whether claimant had been in breach of her obligations to company - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Terms and conditions - Interpretation - Employment terminated before maximum period of two years stipulated in contract - Claimant's right to security of tenure - Whether balance struck between employer's prerogative to dismiss and employee's right to security of tenure - Absence of termination clause - Whether reasonable notice given - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) EMPLOYMENT Contract of service - Corporatisation - Plaintiffs paid benefits upon successful application for voluntary separation scheme ('VSS') - Whether also entitled to 'retirement benefits' provided under cl. 5.5 of company's handbook - Whether two separate contracts - Whether VSS extinguished rights under contract of employment DISMISSAL Breach of company rules and policies - Grooming Rules - Rules contained in contract of employment - Claimant failing to lose weight as per contract of employment - Position held by claimant in company - Effect of - Claimant also a signatory to Collective Agreement (CA) - Claimant not in breach of terms of CA - Whether terms of CA had superseded terms of contract of employment - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Breach of company rules and policies - Whether company had been in breach of its obligations to claimant - Whether company had treated her fairly - Factors to consider - Effect of - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Claimant - Workman or contractor for service - Whether entitled to make representation under s. 20 Industrial Relations Act 1967 for dismissal without just cause or excuse Constructive dismissal - Contract not extended despite verbal assurances given - Induced to sign short term contract instead - Whether constructive dismissal justified - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Constructive dismissal - Demotion - Misconduct - Email sent to employees of company undermining company's good intentions and spreading hatred towards company - Whether demotion justified - Whether a claim for constructive dismissal - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Breach of company's code of conduct - Claimant failing to submit advertisement booking and cheque to customer service unit causing loss to company - Whether no clear procedure and practice in place from time advertisement booking received until transmission to customer service unit - Whether absence of material witnesses failed to prove claimant was dishonest in his act or omission - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Breach of fiduciary duty - Failure to fully disclose facts and requirements for proper approval of housing and car loans - Whether claimant as director failing in duty to act diligently and honestly to company - Whether dismissal justified - Companies Act 1965, s. 133(1)(c) - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Poor performance - Managing Director - Performance below par - Whether sufficient warnings given - Whether company did not develop commercially - Whether dismissal a business decision made in the best interests of company - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Retrenchment - Reorganisation - Company undergoing a reorganisation exercise - Claimant retrenched based on report of company's independent advisers - Claimant's position absorbed by his superior - Whether claimant's position still existed - Intention of company - Whether bona fide - Whether claimant victimised by company - Whether retrenchment in accordance with good labour practice - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Retrenchment - Reorganisation - Whether claimant singled out for retrenchment - Steps taken by company prior to retrenching claimant - Claimant not personally consulted - Whether mala fide intent by company - Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Transfer - Refusal to comply with transfer order - Whether claimant reimbursed for moving or relocation costs - Whether claimant offered an increase in salary - Whether claimant's consensus first sought by company - Whether out-of-state transfers to promote employees unlike claimant - Whether transfer by company made in bad faith - Industrial Relations Act 1967, INDUSTRIAL COURT Jurisdiction - Workman - Whether claimant a workman employed under contract of employment - Whether entitled to make representation under s. 20 Industrial Relations Act 1967 for dismissal without just cause or excuse Procedure - Action - Company wound-up - Whether claimant had to obtain leave from liquidators before proceedings against company - Whether provisions of Companies Act 1965 applied to proceedings in Industrial Court - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3), 26(1), 27, 28, 29, 33A and 33B & Companies Act 1965, ss. 222, 226(3), 226(4) Procedure - Dismissal claim against wound-up company - Whether leave of High Court required before claim could be proceeded with - Companies Act 1965, s. 226(3) Procedure - Whether negotiations between parties at Industrial Relations Department should be included in court - Whether relevant - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 54(1), 54(3) INDEKS PERKARA PEMBUANGAN KERJA Ketidakpatuhan terhadap polisi bank - Kecuaian - Jawatan yang dipegang oleh penuntut - Tanggungjawabnya - Sama ada penuntut cuai di dalam menjalankan tugasannya - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya - Sama ada pembuangan kerja penuntut atas sebab atau alasan adil - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Ketidakpatuhan terhadap polisi syarikat - Kecuaian - Sama ada penuntut cuai di dalam menjalankan tugasannya - Pembelaan penuntut - Sama ada dapat diterima - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya - Sama ada hubungan fidusiari antara penuntut dengan pihak bank telah termusnah akibat tindakannya - Sama ada pembuangan kerja penuntut atas sebab atau alasan adil - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) |
|||
<< Back | |||
Copyright Mylawbox Sdn Bhd | Subscribe | Unsubscribe | ||