If you can't view the message, please click here. | |||
<< Back | BULLETIN 11/2012 | ||
LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 10 of 2012) | |||
SUBJECT INDEX ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Remedies - Judicial review - Dismissal from employment - Whether appropriate penalty - Whether Industrial Court and High Court erred in substituting own views for views of employer CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT Terms and conditions - Transfer - Whether claimant's contract of employment contained a transfer clause - Whether claimant expressly agreed to that clause - Whether he could now object to company relying on it to transfer him - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) DISMISSAL Constructive dismissal - Salary - Non-payment - Claimants continuing to work with company for six months - Whether they had waived their objections by conduct - Factors to consider - Effect of - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Constructive dismissal - Salary - Non-payment - Whether a fundamental breach going to root of contract of employment - Effect of - Receivers and Managers appointed - Whether Receivers and Managers should be held personally liable or responsible - Factors to consider - Effect of - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Constructive dismissal - Transfer - Change in line of reporting - Whether a demotion - Whether transfer bona fide - Whether claimant's role in company systematically reduced - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Constructive dismissal - Transfer - Claimant objecting, refusing to report to new department and walking out of employment - Whether his actions amounted to abandoning job - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Constructive dismissal - Transfer - Claimant transferred to new department - Whether he had been aware of reasons for transfer - Whether job functions in new department substantially different from claimant's existing job functions - Whether transfer carried out in bad faith - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Constructive dismissal - Transfer following allegation of misconduct - Claimant alleged to have given instruction denying medical treatment to Vice Chairman and director of hospital who was also member of State Legislative Council - Whether transfer order a demotion - Whether claimant transferred to new place and position for which he was not contracted to be employed - Whether allegation of misconduct proved - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Forced resignation - Allegations of forced resignation under duress and threat - Negotiations leading up to claimant's resignation - Whether showing claimant resigned on a negotiated settlement with company - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Insubordination - Use of derogatory words against superior and subordinate - Whether sufficient to justify dismissal - Whether allegations not particularised - Industrial Relations Act 1967,
s. 20(3) Misconduct - Breach of fiduciary duty - Receiving paid holiday by company's supplier - Failing to disclose knowledge of special relationship between company's supplier and employee of company to external auditor - Whether claimant breached fiduciary relationship with company - Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Throwing hot drink at worker and uttering threatening words - Whether misconduct proved - Whether serious enough to warrant punishment of dismissal - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Retrenchment - Forklift drivers - Redundant due to outsourcing exercise - Whether company justified in outsourcing work leading to retrenchment - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Retrenchment - Redundancy - Whether retrenchment exercise justified and necessary - Whether there was redundancy - Whether LIFO principle adhered to - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) LABOUR LAW Industrial Court - Decision - Dismissal for misconduct - Appropriate penalty - Whether decision of employer to be given effect to - Whether Industrial Court and High Court erred in substituting own views for views of employer Industrial Court - Decision - Whether Industrial Court Chairman correct in finding employee guilty of misconduct - Whether there was difference between disciplinary proceedings relating to public officers under Federal Constitution and General Orders and cases dealing with private sector employers/employees under Industrial Relations Act 1967 (IRA) - Whether IC Chairman acted within requirements under IRA INDEKS PERKARA PEMBUANGAN KERJA Salah laku - Kecuaian melampau - Kebakaran di tempat bekerja - Sama ada penuntut menyebabkan kebakaran - Sama ada pembuangan kerja tanpa sebab atau alasan adil - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, s. 20(3) |
|||
<< Back | |||
Copyright Mylawbox Sdn Bhd | Subscribe | Unsubscribe | ||