If you can't view the message, please click here. | |||
<< Back | BULLETIN 10/2012 | ||
LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 9 of 2012) | |||
SUBJECT INDEX ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Judicial review - Certiorari - Application to quash Industrial Court award - Dismissal from employment for misconduct - Allegations of sexual harassment - Whether charges clear and specific - Whether Chairman considered relevant facts and disregarded irrelevant facts - Whether findings rational - Whether award within jurisdiction of Industrial Court CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT Terms and conditions - Unilateral variation by company - Five-day week to five and a half-day week - Whether breach of contract of employment - Whether claimant entitled to right of action for unjust dismissal DISMISSAL Absenteeism - Conspired to be absent from work on medical leave on common date - Domestic inquiries - Whether flawed - Whether conspiracy established - Whether operations of company paralysed due to absenteeism - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Constructive dismissal - Transfer - Senior employee - Whether transfer a demotion - Whether claimant's action in having ceased employment an act hastily done - Whether claimant should have first discussed or sought clarifications on matters causing concern - Whether company was right to treat claimant's cessation of employment as an act of resignation without serving proper notice of resignation - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Forced resignation - Claimant alleged she was forced to resign after husband was dismissed - Whether resignation was voluntary - Whether claimant's alleged misconduct proved by company - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Insubordination - Misconduct towards superior - Heated exchange - Whether tantamount to a show of lack of respect or undermining superior's authority - Whether superior had been provocative - Whether claimant's outburst an isolated incident - Whether sufficient to warrant dismissal of claimant Insubordination - Refusal to obey instructions - Failure to report for duty on Saturdays - Shouting at superior - Acting in conflict of interest by assisting another - Whether alleged misconducts proved - Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Claimant's employment status - Whether claimant employee of company at time of dismissal - Whether company discharged burden of disproving that dismissal with just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Dishonesty - Claimant making unauthorised alterations on company's stock and conspiring with another to cheat company - Whether misconduct proved - Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Insubordination - Refusal to go on redundancy transfer - Whether redundancy proved - Whether transfer order lawful - Whether transfer for genuine business considerations and in the company's interests - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Misuse of drugs - Claimant tested positive for drugs on initial laboratory tests - Subsequent results by same laboratory and government hospital showing negative tests - Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Performance - Alleged incompetency - Claimant reprimanded on alleged incompetency - Claimant challenging company to dismiss him and disrupting working environment by shouting for termination letter - Whether company justified in dismissing him - Whether dismissal based on misconduct and not incompetency - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Performance - Poor performance - Probationer - Whether probationer given fair opportunity to prove himself suitable for permanent employment - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Probationer - Poor performance - Failure to call witness to support allegations of poor performance - Whether adverse inference drawn against company - Opportunity to improve performance - Whether given to claimant - Company could have had recourse to extending probationary period if performance unsatisfactory - Whether recourse not taken explained by company - Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse - Evidence Act 1950, s. 114(g) - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Resignation - Forced resignation - Whether claimant forced to resign - Whether evidence pointing to some kind of threat or coercion forcing him to sign resignation letter - Whether claimant's misconduct of bribery based on hearsay evidence - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) LABOUR LAW Industrial Court - Award - Application to quash Industrial Court award - Dismissal from employment for misconduct - Allegations of sexual harassment - Whether charges clear and specific - Whether Chairman considered relevant facts and disregarded irrelevant facts - Whether findings rational - Whether award within jurisdiction of Industrial Court INDEKS PERKARA PEMBUANGAN KERJA Salah laku - Pembaca jangka/meter syarikat - Perbuatan tidak memasukkan jumlah sebenar penggunaan elektrik rumahnya ke dalam sistem syarikat - Sama ada perbuatan yang tidak bertanggungjawab sebagai anggota kerja syarikat mengikut perkara 24 Prosedur Tatatertib Sabah Electricity Sdn Bhd - Sama ada perbuatan penuntut bertujuan menipu syarikat mengikut perkara 43 prosedur yang sama - Sama ada hukuman menurunkan pangkat dan hukuman pembuangan kerja kemudiannya apabila penuntut membuat rayuan wajar dan berpatutan - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, s. 20(3) |
|||
<< Back | |||
Copyright Mylawbox Sdn Bhd | Subscribe | Unsubscribe | ||