If you can't view the message, please click here. | |||
<< Back | BULLETIN 8/2012 | ||
LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 7 of 2012) | |||
SUBJECT INDEX DISMISSAL Breach of company rules/policies - Claimants dismissed for being arrested by Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission on suspicion of corrupt practices - Claimants released and suspicion not proved - Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Constructive dismissal - Forced resignation - Whether claimant was put under compulsion to resign - Claimant's failure to state in his resignation letter that he was constructively dismissed and that company had breached specific terms of employment contract - Whether detrimental to claimant's claim - Withdrawal of company car, handing over of files and relegation of duties - Whether grounds for constructive dismissal - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20 Constructive dismissal - Second claim for constructive dismissal - Claimant claiming constructive dismissal for the second time after reinstatement pursuant to first claim - Claimant relying on representations made in respect of first claim - Whether representations on first claim resolved between parties - Whether fresh representations to be made over second claim - Whether failure to do so rendered court having no jurisdiction to hear second claim - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Constructive dismissal - Transfer - Whether transfer actuated with ulterior motive - Whether unlawful exercise of management right - Industrial relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Authorising payment vouchers as recipient - Claimant alleging that payments were contra payments for alleged debt owed - Whether claimant's personal interest conflicting with interest of employer - Whether claimant abused his position as CEO of company - Whether misconduct serious in nature to warrant dismissal Misconduct - Claimant participated in seminar organised by company's competitor - Whether claimant in breach of employment contract - Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Insubordination - Claimant chef did not heed instructions of hotel's General Manager - Whether claimant committed acts of gross misconduct warranting dismissal - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Physical brawl and attempted theft - Whether misconducts proved on balance of probabilities - Whether justifying dismissal - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Senior manager - Whether failed to perform work duties as required of an employee in a senior position - Whether dismissal with just cause or excuse Performance - Poor performance - Whether poor performance proved - Failure to call witness - Whether fatal to company's case - Whether s. 114(g) Evidence Act 1950 invoked against company - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse Probationer - Poor performance - Whether proved by company - Whether claimant given sufficient time to improve performance - Whether company's failure to hold domestic inquiry fatal to company's case - Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse INDUSTRIAL COURT Jurisdiction - Claim against organisation - Whether court had jurisdiction to hear claim - Whether organisation a company incorporated under Companies Act 1965 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Industrial Relations Act 1967 - Section 56(1) - Non-compliance with award - Order for reinstatement - Whether complied by company | |||
<< Back | |||
Copyright Mylawbox Sdn Bhd | Subscribe | Unsubscribe | ||