If you can't view the message, please click here. | |||
<< Back | BULLETIN 6/2012 | ||
LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 4 of 2012) | |||
SUBJECT INDEX CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT Validity of - Non-citizen - Work permit - Whether claimant having valid work permit - Whether claimant entitled to seek redress from Industrial Court - Employment (Restriction) Act 1968, ss. 5 & 11 - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 2 & 20(3) DISMISSAL Breach of company rules/policies - Accepting money from another company to sponsor jerseys and shoes for company's soccer team - Whether serious misconduct - Whether company failed to take into account claimant's mitigation and 20 years of unblemished record of service before imposing maximum penalty of dismissal - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Breach of company rules/policies - Bribery - Supplier's Chinese New Year gift of RM150 to claimant - Whether an offer - Whether claimant dismissed with just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Breach of company rules/policies - Negligence/Carelessness - Claimant's responsibilities in verifying goods supplied by supplier - Whether claimant to be blamed for faked goods - Whether claimant was negligent in co-signing supplier's invoices - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Constructive dismissal - Claimant alleging company told him not to report to work after medical leave - Claimant's salary also deducted - Whether company by conduct had terminated claimant's services - Whether claimant pursuing disablement benefits from SOCSO - Whether claimant wanting out of contract of employment - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Constructive dismissal - Transfer - Claimant transferred from subsidiary in China to headquarters in Malaysia - Whether reduction in ranking - Whether company acted in bad faith - Whether mere perceived unreasonableness of company - Whether went to root of contract of employment - Whether claimant proved constructive dismissal Insubordination - Claimant's educational trip to London with students without company's consent - Whether company had condoned claimant's act - Whether company took appropriate action against claimant within reasonable time - Whether trip an excuse to dismiss claimant - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Misconduct - Breach of company rules/policies - Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30 Misconduct - Claimant's personal problems affected safety and security of company - Whether cogent evidence adduced to support allegation of misconduct - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Misconduct - Claimant in possession of 38,000 sticks of cigarettes in two bags checked in at Manchester Airport - Claimant denying knowledge of contents of bags - Whether claimant's case probable - Whether company succeeded in proving claimant guilty of misconduct - Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30 Notice of termination - Forced resignation - Whether claimant forced to resign - Failure to call witness to testify - Whether claimant dismissed with just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) Performance - Poor performance - Claimant dismissed for poor performance - Whether claimant having valid work permit - Whether claimant entitled to seek redress from Industrial Court - Employment (Restriction) Act 1968, ss. 5 & 11 - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 2 & 20(3) Termination simpliciter - Liability for dismissal - Claimant employed and terminated by first company but was responsible for managing taxi fleet under second company - Second company and another third company having shares in first company - Whether second and third companies liable for claimant's termination Termination simpliciter - No grounds provided for termination - Whether company had right to terminate claimant's employment - Whether claimant dismissed without just cause and excuse - Dr A Dutt v. Assunta Hospital - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) & 30(5) Unilateral dismissal - Claimant chased out of company's premises - Claimant subsequently writing letter enquiring about his job status - Company failing to respond - Whether claimant unilaterally dismissed - Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 20(3) EVIDENCE Adverse inference - Non-production of witness - Evidence Act 1950, s. 114 illus. (g) INDUSTRIAL COURT Procedure - Res judicata - Whether claimant a workman decided by High Court - Whether company estopped from raising issue in Industrial Court - Whether person a workman a mixed question of law and fact and for Industrial Court to determine - Whether judgment of High Court did not result in final judgment - Whether doctrine of res judicata inapplicable TRADE DISPUTE Picketing - Misconduct - Workmen participated in mock funeral rites during picketing - Punishment suspending annual increment for two years - Whether punishment harsh, unjust and disproportionate - Whether Industrial Court has power to review punishment and impose lesser punishment - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 26(2) & 40 INDEKS PERKARA PEMBUANGAN KERJA Ketidakpatuhan terhadap polisi syarikat - Penuntut meninggalkan premis responden tanpa kebenaran - Penuntut mendakwa telah mendapatkan kebenaran vokal dari penyelianya - Sama ada penuntut berjaya membuktikan - Penuntut gagal untuk balik bekerja semula pada hari yang sama - Sama ada pembuangan kerja penuntut adalah tanpa sebab atau alasan adil - Akta Mahkamah Perusahaan 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) Pembuangan kerja konstruktif - Responden mendakwa penuntut bukan pekerjanya - Keterangan saksi-saksi responden yang bercanggah - Sama ada penuntut pekerja responden - Akta Mahkamah Perusahaan 1967, s. 30(5) Pembuangan kerja konstruktif - Siasatan dalaman - Sama ada penuntut diberi peluang untuk membela diri - Sama ada pembuangan kerja penuntut tanpa sebab atau alasan adil - Akta Mahkamah Perusahaan 1967, ss. 20 (3) & 30(5) Pengarah syarikat - Sama ada penuntut sebagai pengarah syarikat seorang pekerja syarikat - Sama ada penuntut merupakan "mind and brain of the company" - Sama ada penuntut tertakluk kepada peruntukan "Memorandum and Article of Association" syarikat - Sama ada penuntut tertakluk kepada keputusan Lembaga Pengarah memberhentikannya - Chew Yoon Fook v. Keen Corporation Industries Sdn Bhd - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, ss. 2 & 20(3) |
|||
<< Back | |||
Copyright Mylawbox Sdn Bhd | Subscribe | Unsubscribe | ||