<< Back BULLETIN 05/2014

LATEST CASES (ILR Issue 4 of 2014)

SUBJECT INDEX

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Judicial review - Judicial review proceedings - Appeal to set aside High Court order quashing award of Industrial Court - Whether award of Industrial Court tainted with illegality, irrationality or impropriety - Whether High Court erroneously exercised appellate jurisdiction in judicial review proceedings
Tenaga Nasional Bhd v. Yahaya Jusoh
(Abdul Wahab Patail JCA, Rohana Yusuf JCA & Tengku Maimun JCA) [2014] 2 ILR 1 cljlaw labourlaw

DISMISSAL

Breach of company rules and policies - Negligence - Whether the claimants had been negligent in carrying out their duties - Evaluation of the evidence adduced - Justifications and defences put forward by the claimants - Whether tenable - Effect of - Whether the claimants had been aware of the correct procedures to follow - Whether they had wilfully disobeyed it - What the claimants should have done - Whether dismissals without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Maybank Finance Berhad v. Chan Toong San & Another Case
(Gulam Muhiaddeen Abdul Aziz) [2014] 2 ILR 12 cljlaw labourlaw

Breach of company rules and policies - Negligence - Whether the claimants had complied with the BNM and internal guidelines before approving the loan facility - Whether both the guidelines could be read in harmony - Factors to consider - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether charges proven by the company - Whether it had been a serious misconduct - Positions held by the claimants - Whether their dismissals had been justified - Whether dismissals without just cause and excuse
Maybank Finance Berhad v. Chan Toong San & Another Case
(Gulam Muhiaddeen Abdul Aziz) [2014] 2 ILR 12 cljlaw labourlaw

Breach of company rules and policies - Unauthorised receipt of gratification - Claimants allegedly accepting bribes - Whether proven by the company - Evaluation of the evidence - Effect of - Whether the company had acted reasonably in thinking the claimants had been guilty of the charges - Duty owed by the claimants to the company - Whether discharged - Factors to consider - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Rosli Abdul Aziz & Ors v. Puspakom Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2014] 2 ILR 100 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct - Claimants allegedly abandoning their lorries and failing to hand over the keys - Whether proven by the company - Evidence adduced - Whether there had been any written policies on the same - Effect of - Whether dismissal without just cause and excuse
Sundararaj M Ramasamy & Ors v. Nittsu Transport Service (M) Sdn Bhd
(Yamuna Menon) [2014] 2 ILR 117 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct - Claimants allegedly absent from work without permission - Whether proven by the company - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Company's actions towards the claimants - Whether it had been reasonable - Whether it had caused difficulties to the claimants - Factors to consider
Sundararaj M Ramasamy & Ors v. Nittsu Transport Service (M) Sdn Bhd
(Yamuna Menon) [2014] 2 ILR 117 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct - Claimants allegedly leaving the company's premises without permission - Whether proven by the company - Evidence adduced - Effect of
Sundararaj M Ramasamy & Ors v. Nittsu Transport Service (M) Sdn Bhd
(Yamuna Menon) [2014] 2 ILR 117 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct - Claimants allegedly not having the intention to proceed with their assignments but filling up fuel tanks - Whether proven by the company - Evidence adduced - Effect of
Sundararaj M Ramasamy & Ors v. Nittsu Transport Service (M) Sdn Bhd
(Yamuna Menon) [2014] 2 ILR 117 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct - Picketing - Whether the claimants had been involved in a picket - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Claimants admitting to the same - Whether the picket had been illegal - Factors to consider - Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 10
Sundararaj M Ramasamy & Ors v. Nittsu Transport Service (M) Sdn Bhd
(Yamuna Menon) [2014] 2 ILR 117 cljlaw labourlaw

Misconduct - Strike - Whether the claimants had been involved in an illegal strike - Factors to consider - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether misconduct proven by the company - Whether the company had discharged its burden of proof
Sundararaj M Ramasamy & Ors v. Nittsu Transport Service (M) Sdn Bhd
(Yamuna Menon) [2014] 2 ILR 117 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Reorganisation - Claimant retrenched - Whether the claimant had been the only one retrenched - Evidence adduced - Effect of - Whether the reorganisation by the company had been carried out bona fide - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Norhayati Sulaiman v. Uzma Engineering Sdn Bhd
(Aslina Joned) [2014] 2 ILR 44 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Reorganisation - Claimant retrenched - Whether the claimant's position had ceased to exist - Evidence adduced - Evaluation of - Conduct of the company towards the claimant - Whether it had been equitable - Whether the company's actions had been reasonable - Effect of - Whether dismissal without just cause and excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Norhayati Sulaiman v. Uzma Engineering Sdn Bhd
(Aslina Joned) [2014] 2 ILR 44 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Reorganisation - Claimant retrenched - Whether the company had been suffering financial difficulties as alleged - Evidence adduced - Evaluation of - Effect of - Steps taken by the company of the material time - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Norhayati Sulaiman v. Uzma Engineering Sdn Bhd
(Aslina Joned) [2014] 2 ILR 44 cljlaw labourlaw

Retrenchment - Reorganisation - Claimant retrenched - Whether the company had complied with the Code of Conduct for Industrial Harmony - Factors to consider - Effect of - Whether the company had behaved reasonably - Whether dismissal without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5) & Code of Conduct for Industrial Harmony 1975, arts. 21 and 22
Norhayati Sulaiman v. Uzma Engineering Sdn Bhd
(Aslina Joned) [2014] 2 ILR 44 cljlaw labourlaw

DOMESTIC INQUIRY

Absence of - No domestic inquiry held against the claimants prior to their dismissals - Reasons for the same - Effect of - Whether the company had conducted a due inquiry - Whether the claimants had been given a chance to explain - Evaluation of the evidence - Effect of - Conduct of the company - Whether dismissals without just cause or excuse - Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Rosli Abdul Aziz & Ors v. Puspakom Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2014] 2 ILR 100 cljlaw labourlaw

Procedural impropriety - Charges - Whether proper charges had been framed against the claimants - Factors to consider - Whether the claimants had been aware of the charges they had to answer to - Conduct of the claimants and the company - Factors to consider
Rosli Abdul Aziz & Ors v. Puspakom Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2014] 2 ILR 100 cljlaw labourlaw

Procedural impropriety - Whether conducted in a proper manner - Factors to consider - Effect of
Sundararaj M Ramasamy & Ors v. Nittsu Transport Service (M) Sdn Bhd
(Yamuna Menon) [2014] 2 ILR 117 cljlaw labourlaw

EVIDENCE

Standard of proof - Whether reasonable suspicion amounting to the belief in the guilt of the employee had been established by the company - Conduct of the company towards the claimants - Results of the company's investigations - Whether the company had been reasonable in dismissing them - Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse
Rosli Abdul Aziz & Ors v. Puspakom Sdn Bhd
(Anna Ng Fui Choo) [2014] 2 ILR 100 cljlaw labourlaw

LABOUR LAW

Employment - Absenteeism - Leave without approval - Failure to report back to work - Whether appellant condoned the respondent's conduct - Whether dismissal with just cause and excuse
Tenaga Nasional Bhd v. Yahaya Jusoh
(Abdul Wahab Patail JCA, Rohana Yusuf JCA & Tengku Maimun JCA) [2014] 2 ILR 1 cljlaw labourlaw

Industrial Court - Award - Application for judicial review to quash award of Industrial Court - Whether Industrial Court committed error of law - Whether High Court could interfere with findings of fact by Industrial Court
Tenaga Nasional Bhd v. Yahaya Jusoh
(Abdul Wahab Patail JCA, Rohana Yusuf JCA & Tengku Maimun JCA) [2014] 2 ILR 1 cljlaw labourlaw

INDEKS PERKARA

MAHKAMAH PERUSAHAAN

Remedi - Hukuman - Faktor mitigasi - Sama ada hukuman buang kerja YM setimpal dengan salah lakunya - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - YM berkhidmat untuk syarikat selama 17 tahun – Kesannya
Tan Siew Hong lwn. Wah Ann Trading Sdn Bhd
(Roslan Mat Nor) [2014] 2 ILR 59 cljlaw labourlaw

PEMBUANGAN KERJA

Ketidakpatuhan terhadap polisi syarikat - Kecuaian - YM menghantar cek kepada pengedar syarikat bertentangan dengan peraturan-peraturan kewangan - Sama ada berjaya dibuktikan oleh syarikat - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - Sama ada YM cuai dalam menjalankan tugasnya - Sama ada tindakan syarikat menamatkan perkhidmatannya munasabah - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - YM bekerja dengan syarikat selama 17 tahun - Kesannya - Sama ada YM telah dibuang kerja tanpa alasan yang adil dan bersebab - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Tan Siew Hong lwn. Wah Ann Trading Sdn Bhd
(Roslan Mat Nor) [2014] 2 ILR 59 cljlaw labourlaw

PENAMATAN PERKHIDMATAN

Notis pemberhentian - Perletakkan jawatan secara paksa - Sama ada YM telah dipaksa meletak jawatan - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - Perwatakan dan pendidikan YM - Sama ada pembuangan kerja YM telah dilakukan secara adil dan bersebab
Chong Chuan Ming lwn. Metertek Sdn Bhd
(Hamdan Indah) [2014] 2 ILR 86 cljlaw labourlaw

PENAMATAN PERKHIDMATAN

Prestasi kerja - Prestasi kerja yang tidak memuaskan - Sama ada berjaya dibuktikan oleh syarikat - Keterangan yang dikemukakan - Kesannya - Tindakan syarikat - Sama ada bertentangan dengan amalan biasa sesuatu organisasi - Apa yang syarikat seharusnya lakukan - Sama ada tindakan syarikat berpatutan - Kesannya - Sama ada pembuangan kerja YM telah dilakukan secara adil dan bersebab - Akta Perhubungan Perusahaan 1967, ss. 20(3) & 30(5)
Chong Chuan Ming lwn. Metertek Sdn Bhd
(Hamdan Indah) [2014] 2 ILR 86 cljlaw labourlaw

SIASATAN DALAMAN

Kesilapan prosedur - Komposisi panel Siasatan Dalaman - Hanya seorang yang duduk atas panel Siasatan Dalaman - Sama ada komposisi sedemikian mengikut prinsip perbicaraan yang adil dan keadilan asasi - Faktor-faktor yang harus diambil kira - Kesannya - Fungsi panel Siasatan Dalaman - Kesannya - Sama ada keterangan yang dikemukakan di hadapan panel sebegini boleh digunakan oleh mahkamah
Tan Siew Hong lwn. Wah Ann Trading Sdn Bhd
(Roslan Mat Nor) [2014] 2 ILR 59 cljlaw labourlaw

Copyright Mylawbox Sdn Bhd Subscribe | Unsubscribe