CASE HIGHTLIGHTS

KESATUAN KEBANGSAAN PEKERJA-PEKERJA PERUSAHAAN ALAT-ALAT PENGANGKUTAN DAN SEKUTU v. ISUZU HICOM MALAYSIA SDN BHD
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
FRANKLIN GOONTING
EMPLOYEES’ PANEL: PREM KUMAR APPUKUTTY
EMPLOYERS’ PANEL: ANANDARAJU MOOKKAPILLAI
AWARD NO. 2713 OF 2019 [CASE NO: 28(21)/2-1586/17]
14 OCTOBER 2019

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Article on attendance allowance – What would be a fair amount to set – Whether the status quo ought to be maintained – Factors to consider – Effect of

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Article on duration – Determination of the duration of the 5th CA – Factors to consider – Effect of – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 30(7)

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Article on retirement benefit – Benefits currently granted by the company – Whether sufficient – Whether the status quo ought to be maintained – Factors to consider – Effect of

TRADE DISPUTE: Collective Agreement – Terms and conditions of service – Article on wages and increment – Determination of a fair percentage to allow – Factors to consider – Evidence adduced – Effect of


K SAKTHIASEELAN KUMARAVELOO v. POLIKLINIK DAN SURGERI SEMARAK (AKER SOLUTION IN-HOUSE CLINIC)
INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
P IRUTHAYARAJ D PAPPUSAMY
AWARD NO. 2845 OF 2019 [CASE NO: 24(19)/4-2287/18]
30 OCTOBER 2019

EVIDENCE: Documentary evidence – Whether the claimant, who had been employed as a locum doctor, had been a workman within the definition of s. 2 of the Industrial Relations Act – Factors to consider – Evidence adduced – Effect of – Evaluation of the evidence and case laws – What it had shown – What the intention of the parties had been – Conduct and actions of the claimant – What it had shown – Industrial Relations Act 1967, s. 2